![]() Not to introduce too many other things but when you open a door it is not disassembled, if you remove the pins and the door is separated from the frame then you can say it was disassembled. "the piston can be disassembled for transport" 1 : to come apart the frame disassembles into sections. (m) “Detachable magazine” means any ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm without disassembly of the firearm action or use of a tool."ĭrilling out the hex head on a maglock means nothing IMO a broken screw extractor is as easy to use as a hex wrench, it is designed to remove the screw without disassembling the firearm action.Īs someone else asked or stated, the word "disassembly" must be defined and when common dictionary definitions are used simply removing the rear pin and pivoting the upper away from the lower is not disassembly, the upper is still attached to the lower and the common definition means one part of separated from the other into pieces. That link has several posts which use the term "partial disassembly" when the word "partial" isn't part of the law:Ĭalifornia Code of Regulations Title 11 Division 5 Chapter 39 Article 2 Section 5471 I'm debating on drilling out the sets crew as instructed on the package. I use Gen 4 w/ kingpin and red loctite on 2 builds. Therefore, your statement about maglocks is invalid. But, like you said "Possible to do" does not equal "he did it". Amiright?įunny thing is, I agree with you! Yeah, is it possible to remove a maglock with a tool? Yep. It is quick and easy to change very many firearms into an illegal configuration, but until you do it you haven't done anything wrong. May I quote you from another thread? You stated: "Possible to do" does not equal "he did it". If you have nothing in this life to lose, then maybe it is the compliance device for you ![]() It is no different than a bullet button in that regard, "use a tool". The simple fact is, the mag can be removed with an allen wrench from outside the gun. And the page you refer to makes a ridiculous, vague and constructed claim while helpfully reiterating what a maglock should be, then blatantly ignores the elephant in the room: Absolute BS you are spreading, because DOJ does not approve or endorse any of these compliance devices and DOJ never says it is 100% legal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |